Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Some research on performance KVM vs ESX

Case1: Tools: SPECvirt_sc2010 http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2010/results/specvirt_sc2010_perf.html Sames HW, ESXi 4.1 scores 3824 with 234 VMs, KVM 4603 and host 282 VMs, which is 20% higher. Case2: Tools: SPECvirt_sc2010 http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2010/results/specvirt_sc2010_perf.html 3894 vs 3723, KVM 4.5% higher. Case3: Tools: SPECvirt_sc2013 (New tools, as of 9/24/2014 only the below data avaiable) http://www.spec.org/cgi-bin/osgresults RHEL7 1614 with 90 VMs on a E5-2699v3 platform, which is much higher than last generation E5-2697v2 with 935 and 50VMs. KVM is clearly better on the performance side, and also the price side.

Saturday, November 01, 2008

唐诗记单词系列之4_立克英语中心

唐诗记单词系列之4_立克英语中心

80. After dinner sit a while; after supper walk a
mile.

Build Your Business on Blogging - Solutions by PC Magazine

Build Your Business on Blogging - Solutions by PC Magazine

On the flip side, if you can hire developers, a systems administration team, and perhaps even project managers, then consider stepping up to a full-featured open-source content management system, like Drupal or Alfresco. This kind of system will give you the maximum amount of flexibility, but with the need for dedicated staff it won't be easy on your bank account.

Friday, October 31, 2008